| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800U vs Core i5-11300H


Description
The 4800U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.2 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
806c1
Core
Renoir
Tiger Lake H35
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.92k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
356.81k points
285.75k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.53k
25.83k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
24.67k
23.56k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
9.2k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
5.06k (x0.66)
TOTAL
57.92k
63.64k (x1.1)

Multithread

4800U

i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
121.96k
116.87k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
162.82k
121.08k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
68.25k
41.8k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
6k (x1.58)
TOTAL
356.81k
285.75k (x0.8)

Performance/W
4800U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
8131 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
10854 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4550 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
252 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
23788 points/W
8164 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3936 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
13790 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4