Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.5 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.5 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
50654
Core
Renoir
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
March 2020
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
18.78k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
16.25k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
3.99k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
6.8k (x0.74)
TOTAL
61.12k
45.82k (x0.75)
Multithread
4800HS
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
133.55k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
108.43k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
30.02k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
9.48k (x1.26)
TOTAL
427.61k
281.48k (x0.66)
Performance/W
4800HS
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800HS
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4