Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Core i7-6900K
Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-6900K is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1 times faster than the i7-6900K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1 times faster than the i7-6900K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
406f1
Core
Renoir
Broadwell-E
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2020
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
49.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
427.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
23.11k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
17.84k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
5.34k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
3.47k (x0.38)
TOTAL
61.12k
49.76k (x0.81)
Multithread
4800HS
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
184.19k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
181.2k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
47.44k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
14.69k (x1.96)
TOTAL
427.61k
427.51k (x1)
Performance/W
4800HS
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
1316 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
3054 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800HS
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
6247 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
4822 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1444 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
13450 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4