Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Core i7-6600U
Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-6600U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i7-6600U gets 79.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 5.4 times faster than the i7-6600U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i7-6600U gets 79.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 5.4 times faster than the i7-6600U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
406e3
Core
Renoir
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
39.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
79.22k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
16.72k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
14.7k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
3.4k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
4.9k (x0.54)
TOTAL
61.12k
39.73k (x0.65)
Multithread
4800HS
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
33.41k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
31.66k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
8.18k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
5.97k (x0.8)
TOTAL
427.61k
79.22k (x0.19)
Performance/W
4800HS
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
2227 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
546 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
398 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
5282 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800HS
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
4325 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
999 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
11684 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4