| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Core i7-10750H


Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0652
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
349.21k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
29.06k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
26.49k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
6.23k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
13.89k (x1.52)
TOTAL
61.12k
75.67k (x1.24)

Multithread

4800HS

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
154.61k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
151.34k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
36.33k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
6.93k (x0.92)
TOTAL
427.61k
349.21k (x0.82)

Performance/W
4800HS
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800HS
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4