| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Core i5-8300H


Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800HS is 2.3 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
906ea
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
182.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
23.6k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
21.72k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
4.61k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
6.8k (x0.74)
TOTAL
61.12k
56.72k (x0.93)

Multithread

4800HS

i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
79.12k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
81.27k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
17.46k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
4.62k (x0.62)
TOTAL
427.61k
182.47k (x0.43)

Performance/W
4800HS
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
4055 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800HS
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4