| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs 5800X


Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5800X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.3 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a20f10
Core
Renoir
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
89.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
558.42k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
24.14k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
26.3k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
12.09k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
26.54k (x2.9)
TOTAL
61.12k
89.07k (x1.46)

Multithread

4800HS

5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
183.54k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
237.27k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
107.95k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
29.66k (x3.95)
TOTAL
427.61k
558.42k (x1.31)

Performance/W
4800HS
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
1028 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800HS
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
5137 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
5596 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2571 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
5646 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
18951 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4