Ryzen 7 4800HS vs 2700X
Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
800f82
Core
Renoir
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
433.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
15.61k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
26.08k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
5.84k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
18.34k (x2.01)
TOTAL
61.12k
65.87k (x1.08)
Multithread
4800HS
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
123.33k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
240.46k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
61.23k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
8.17k (x1.09)
TOTAL
427.61k
433.19k (x1.01)
Performance/W
4800HS
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
2290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
4126 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800HS
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
3631 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
4266 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4