Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
Both models 4800HS and 3600 are based on Zen 2 architecture.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.2 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.2 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
870f10
Core
Renoir
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
348.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
16.04k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
24.47k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
8.38k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
21.66k (x2.37)
TOTAL
61.12k
70.55k (x1.15)
Multithread
4800HS
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
113.63k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
143.55k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
63.84k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
27.34k (x3.64)
TOTAL
427.61k
348.35k (x0.81)
Performance/W
4800HS
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800HS
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4