Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.3 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.3 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
800f82
Core
Renoir
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
15.75k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
26.29k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
5.91k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
18.48k (x2.02)
TOTAL
61.12k
66.44k (x1.09)
Multithread
4800HS
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
94.49k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
182.53k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
45.95k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
10.15k (x1.35)
TOTAL
427.61k
333.12k (x0.78)
Performance/W
4800HS
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800HS
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4