Ryzen 7 4800H vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.4 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.4 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
50657
Core
Renoir
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
311.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
16.86k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
12.08k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
3.37k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
6.29k (x0.79)
TOTAL
57.47k
38.61k (x0.67)
Multithread
4800H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
150.99k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
118.54k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
33.44k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
8.6k (x1.6)
TOTAL
436.8k
311.57k (x0.71)
Performance/W
4800H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4