| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800H vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.6 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
50654
Core
Renoir
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2020
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
281.48k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
18.78k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
16.25k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
3.99k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
6.8k (x0.85)
TOTAL
57.47k
45.82k (x0.8)

Multithread

4800H

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
133.55k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
108.43k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
30.02k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
9.48k (x1.76)
TOTAL
436.8k
281.48k (x0.64)

Performance/W
4800H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4