| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800H vs Core m3-7Y30


Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 8.3 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
806e9
Core
Renoir
Kaby Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
45 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
52.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
10.02k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
9.22k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
2.04k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
4.31k (x0.54)
TOTAL
57.47k
25.6k (x0.45)

Multithread

4800H

m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
21.75k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
20.51k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
4.97k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
5.56k (x1.03)
TOTAL
436.8k
52.78k (x0.12)

Performance/W
4800H
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
11730 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800H
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4