Ryzen 7 4800H vs Core i7-6700HQ
Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i7-6700HQ gets 205.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 2.1 times faster than the i7-6700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i7-6700HQ gets 205.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 2.1 times faster than the i7-6700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
506e3
Core
Renoir
Skylake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
50.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
205.24k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
21.33k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
18.34k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
4.44k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
6.44k (x0.81)
TOTAL
57.47k
50.54k (x0.88)
Multithread
4800H
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
91.89k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
87.87k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
20.61k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
4.87k (x0.9)
TOTAL
436.8k
205.24k (x0.47)
Performance/W
4800H
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
2042 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
1953 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
458 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
4561 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800H
i7-6700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
6094 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5240 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
1840 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
14441 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4