Ryzen 7 4800H vs Core i7-10870H
Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0652
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
487.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
30.38k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
27.95k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
6.51k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
14.37k (x1.8)
TOTAL
57.47k
79.2k (x1.38)
Multithread
4800H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
216.18k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
210.82k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
51.57k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
8.47k (x1.57)
TOTAL
436.8k
487.05k (x1.12)
Performance/W
4800H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4