Ryzen 7 4800H vs Core i5-8300H
Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 2.4 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 2.4 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906ea
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
182.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
23.6k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
21.72k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
4.61k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
6.8k (x0.85)
TOTAL
57.47k
56.72k (x0.99)
Multithread
4800H
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
79.12k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
81.27k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
17.46k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
4.62k (x0.86)
TOTAL
436.8k
182.47k (x0.42)
Performance/W
4800H
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
4055 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800H
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4