Ryzen 7 4800H vs Core i5-4590
Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-4590 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i5-4590 gets 140 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 3.1 times faster than the i5-4590 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i5-4590 gets 140 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 3.1 times faster than the i5-4590 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
306c3
Core
Renoir
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
40.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
139.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
20.88k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
11.12k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
4.75k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
4.19k (x0.52)
TOTAL
57.47k
40.93k (x0.71)
Multithread
4800H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
75.76k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
40.42k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
16.97k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
6.84k (x1.27)
TOTAL
436.8k
139.99k (x0.32)
Performance/W
4800H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
902 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
481 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
1667 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
5643 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
3006 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
1132 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
11063 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4