| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800H vs Core i5-10500T


Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0653
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
302.13k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
25.16k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
22.28k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
5.18k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
11.97k (x1.5)
TOTAL
57.47k
64.6k (x1.12)

Multithread

4800H

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
144.86k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
120.98k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
32.55k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
3.73k (x0.69)
TOTAL
436.8k
302.13k (x0.69)

Performance/W
4800H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4