| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800H vs Core i3-9100


Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.9 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
906eb
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
229.2k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
28.03k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
24.5k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
5.73k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
8.48k (x1.06)
TOTAL
57.47k
66.74k (x1.16)

Multithread

4800H

i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
107.5k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
95.11k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
22.02k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
4.57k (x0.85)
TOTAL
436.8k
229.2k (x0.52)

Performance/W
4800H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
1463 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
70 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
3526 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
6675 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5833 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
2018 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
15891 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4