Ryzen 7 4800H vs Core i3-7100
Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i3-7100 gets 124.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 3.5 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i3-7100 gets 124.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 3.5 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906e9
Core
Renoir
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
45 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
57.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
124.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
25.53k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
22.98k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
5.37k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
3.97k (x0.5)
TOTAL
57.47k
57.86k (x1.01)
Multithread
4800H
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
54.73k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
53.55k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
12.93k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
3.6k (x0.67)
TOTAL
436.8k
124.8k (x0.29)
Performance/W
4800H
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
1050 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
254 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
2447 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800H
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
6547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5893 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
14836 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4