Ryzen 7 4800H vs Engineering Sample 906ED 2.1GHz
Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 906ED 2.1GHz is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the 906ED 2.1GHz gets 657.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906ED 2.1GHz is 1.5 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the 906ED 2.1GHz gets 657.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906ED 2.1GHz is 1.5 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906ed
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2020
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
86.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
657.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
33.92k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
30k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
7.01k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
15.73k (x1.97)
TOTAL
57.47k
86.65k (x1.51)
Multithread
4800H
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
302.78k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
278.98k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
67.89k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
7.53k (x1.4)
TOTAL
436.8k
657.19k (x1.5)
Performance/W
4800H
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W