Ryzen 7 4800H vs Engineering Sample 906EC
Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 906EC is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the 906EC gets 494.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906EC is 1.1 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the 906EC gets 494.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906EC is 1.1 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906ec
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
494.24k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
906EC
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
28.3k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
24.99k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
5.55k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
11.71k (x1.47)
TOTAL
57.47k
70.55k (x1.23)
Multithread
4800H
906EC
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
229.27k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
209.21k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
48.53k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
7.23k (x1.34)
TOTAL
436.8k
494.24k (x1.13)
Performance/W
4800H
906EC
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W