Ryzen 7 4800H vs 3800XT
Description
Both models 4800H and 3800XT are based on Zen 2 architecture.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.2 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.2 times faster than the 4800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
870f10
Core
Renoir
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
January 2020
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
17.57k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
27.38k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
9.35k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
23.9k (x3)
TOTAL
57.47k
78.2k (x1.36)
Multithread
4800H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
176.08k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
219.88k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
100k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
12.93k (x2.4)
TOTAL
436.8k
508.89k (x1.17)
Performance/W
4800H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800H
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4