| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800H vs Ryzen 5 5625U


Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.6 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a50f00
Core
Renoir
Barcelo
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
281.26k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
18.57k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
22.03k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
9.55k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
20.5k (x2.57)
TOTAL
57.47k
70.65k (x1.23)

Multithread

4800H

5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
92.92k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
128.4k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
54.82k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
5.13k (x0.95)
TOTAL
436.8k
281.26k (x0.64)

Performance/W
4800H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
18750 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4