| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800H vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.5 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
800f82
Core
Renoir
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
292.31k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
13.83k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
23.16k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
5.15k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
15.18k (x1.9)
TOTAL
57.47k
57.33k (x1)

Multithread

4800H

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
83.44k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
161.53k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
40.62k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
6.72k (x1.25)
TOTAL
436.8k
292.31k (x0.67)

Performance/W
4800H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
4497 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4