| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800H vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 2.6 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
810f81
Core
Renoir
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
168.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
14.48k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
23.84k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
5.43k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
5.46k (x0.68)
TOTAL
57.47k
49.21k (x0.86)

Multithread

4800H

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
54.39k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
88.77k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
20.04k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
5.48k (x1.02)
TOTAL
436.8k
168.69k (x0.39)

Performance/W
4800H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4