Ryzen 7 4800H vs Athlon X4 950
Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 950 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 4.4 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 4.4 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
660f51
Core
Renoir
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2020
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
34.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
99.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
950
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
12.44k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
15.96k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
3.54k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
3k (x0.38)
TOTAL
57.47k
34.93k (x0.61)
Multithread
4800H
950
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
40.75k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
42.07k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
12.53k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
4.45k (x0.83)
TOTAL
436.8k
99.8k (x0.23)
Performance/W
4800H
950
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
627 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
1535 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800H
950
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
3274 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
931 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4