| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800H vs Core i3-12100F


Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
90675
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
340.49k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
39.54k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
23.79k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
11.96k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
13.52k (x1.69)
TOTAL
57.47k
88.81k (x1.55)

Multithread

4800H

i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
148k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
123.08k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
52.73k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
16.67k (x3.1)
TOTAL
436.8k
340.49k (x0.78)

Performance/W
4800H
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
5871 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800H
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4