Ryzen 7 4800H vs Core i3-1115G4
Description
The 4800H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 3.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800H gets a score of 436.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 3.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
806c1
Core
Renoir
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.47k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
436.8k points
137.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
24.25k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
21.63k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.38k
9.09k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.98k
7.23k (x0.91)
TOTAL
57.47k
62.19k (x1.08)
Multithread
4800H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
152.43k
56.9k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
195.79k
55.68k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.2k
19.29k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.38k
6.09k (x1.13)
TOTAL
436.8k
137.96k (x0.32)
Performance/W
4800H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3387 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4351 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1849 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
9707 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3950 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5599 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2234 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1899 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
13683 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4