Ryzen 7 3800XT vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The 3800XT is based on Zen 2 architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 2.3 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 2.3 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
406f1
Core
Matisse
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/28
TDP
105 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
35840 kB
Date
July 2020
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
78.2k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
508.89k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800XT
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.57k
17.8k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
27.38k
16.51k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.35k
4.47k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.9k
2.56k (x0.11)
TOTAL
78.2k
41.35k (x0.53)
Multithread
3800XT
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
176.08k
494.82k (x2.81)
Test#2 (FP)
219.88k
514.13k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
132.87k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.93k
20.8k (x1.61)
TOTAL
508.89k
1162.63k (x2.28)
Performance/W
3800XT
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1677 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
952 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
123 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
4847 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800XT
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3738 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5827 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1989 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5085 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
16638 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4