Ryzen 7 3800XT vs Core i7-4500U
Description
The 3800XT is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-4500U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the i7-4500U gets 66.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 7.7 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the i7-4500U gets 66.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 7.7 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
40651
Core
Matisse
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
8/16
2 /2
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2020
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
78.2k points
33.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
508.89k points
66.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800XT
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.57k
16.67k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
27.38k
9k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.35k
3.75k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.9k
3.6k (x0.15)
TOTAL
78.2k
33.02k (x0.42)
Multithread
3800XT
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
176.08k
31.77k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
219.88k
21.36k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
7.95k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.93k
5.06k (x0.39)
TOTAL
508.89k
66.14k (x0.13)
Performance/W
3800XT
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1677 points/W
2118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
1424 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
952 points/W
530 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
123 points/W
338 points/W
TOTAL
4847 points/W
4410 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800XT
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3738 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5827 points/GHz
3001 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1989 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5085 points/GHz
1199 points/GHz
TOTAL
16638 points/GHz
11008 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4