Ryzen 7 3800XT vs Core i7-10870H
Description
The 3800XT is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0652
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
78.2k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
508.89k points
487.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800XT
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.57k
30.38k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
27.38k
27.95k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.35k
6.51k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.9k
14.37k (x0.6)
TOTAL
78.2k
79.2k (x1.01)
Multithread
3800XT
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
176.08k
216.18k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
219.88k
210.82k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
51.57k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.93k
8.47k (x0.65)
TOTAL
508.89k
487.05k (x0.96)
Performance/W
3800XT
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
1677 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
952 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
123 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
4847 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800XT
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3738 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5827 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1989 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5085 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
16638 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4