Ryzen 7 3800XT vs Core i5-10400F
Description
The 3800XT is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0655
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
July 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
78.2k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
508.89k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800XT
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
17.57k
28.39k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
27.38k
24.89k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.35k
5.78k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.9k
13.19k (x0.55)
TOTAL
78.2k
72.25k (x0.92)
Multithread
3800XT
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
176.08k
180.2k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
219.88k
163.51k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
40.6k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.93k
6.48k (x0.5)
TOTAL
508.89k
390.78k (x0.77)
Performance/W
3800XT
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1677 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
952 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
123 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
4847 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800XT
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3738 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5827 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1989 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5085 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
16638 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4