Ryzen 7 3800XT vs Engineering Sample 906ED 2.1GHz
Description
The 3800XT is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 906ED 2.1GHz is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the 906ED 2.1GHz gets 657.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906ED 2.1GHz is 1.3 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the 906ED 2.1GHz gets 657.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906ED 2.1GHz is 1.3 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
906ed
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2020
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
78.2k points
86.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
508.89k points
657.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800XT
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
17.57k
33.92k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
27.38k
30k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.35k
7.01k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.9k
15.73k (x0.66)
TOTAL
78.2k
86.65k (x1.11)
Multithread
3800XT
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
176.08k
302.78k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
219.88k
278.98k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
67.89k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.93k
7.53k (x0.58)
TOTAL
508.89k
657.19k (x1.29)
Performance/W
3800XT
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
1677 points/W