Ryzen 7 3800XT vs 5800H
Description
The 3800XT is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.2 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.2 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a50f00
Core
Matisse
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2020
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
78.2k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
508.89k points
426.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800XT
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.57k
20.37k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
27.38k
22.52k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.35k
10.18k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.9k
21.49k (x0.9)
TOTAL
78.2k
74.56k (x0.95)
Multithread
3800XT
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
176.08k
144.01k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
219.88k
191.86k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
84.53k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.93k
6.5k (x0.5)
TOTAL
508.89k
426.9k (x0.84)
Performance/W
3800XT
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1677 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
952 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
123 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
4847 points/W
9487 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800XT
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3738 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5827 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1989 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5085 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16638 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4