Ryzen 7 3800XT vs 3700X
Description
Both models 3800XT and 3700X are based on Zen 2 architecture.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the 3700X gets 491.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the 3700X gets 491.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
870f10
Core
Matisse
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
July 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
78.2k points
74.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
508.89k points
491.15k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800XT
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.57k
16.81k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
27.38k
26.39k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.35k
8.82k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.9k
22.73k (x0.95)
TOTAL
78.2k
74.75k (x0.96)
Multithread
3800XT
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
176.08k
170.29k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
219.88k
213.21k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
96.03k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.93k
11.62k (x0.9)
TOTAL
508.89k
491.15k (x0.97)
Performance/W
3800XT
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1677 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
3280 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
952 points/W
1477 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
123 points/W
179 points/W
TOTAL
4847 points/W
7556 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800XT
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3738 points/GHz
3821 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5827 points/GHz
5998 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1989 points/GHz
2005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5085 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
TOTAL
16638 points/GHz
16990 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4