| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3800XT vs Ryzen 5 5600G


Description
The 3800XT is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.5 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a50f00
Core
Matisse
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2020
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
78.2k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
508.89k points
345.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800XT
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.57k
22.16k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
27.38k
24.46k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.35k
10.71k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.9k
22.44k (x0.94)
TOTAL
78.2k
79.76k (x1.02)

Multithread

3800XT

5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
176.08k
112.5k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
219.88k
153.92k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
67.75k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.93k
11.47k (x0.89)
TOTAL
508.89k
345.64k (x0.68)

Performance/W
3800XT
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
1677 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
952 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
123 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
4847 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
3800XT
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
3738 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5827 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1989 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5085 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
16638 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4