| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3800XT vs Ryzen 5 5600


Description
The 3800XT is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5600 is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.2 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a20f12
Core
Matisse
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
July 2020
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
78.2k points
83.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
508.89k points
429.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800XT
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
17.57k
22.73k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
27.38k
24.59k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.35k
11.44k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.9k
25.03k (x1.05)
TOTAL
78.2k
83.79k (x1.07)

Multithread

3800XT

5600
Test#1 (Integers)
176.08k
134.28k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
219.88k
178.56k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
78.16k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.93k
38.26k (x2.96)
TOTAL
508.89k
429.25k (x0.84)

Performance/W
3800XT
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
1677 points/W
2066 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
952 points/W
1202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
123 points/W
589 points/W
TOTAL
4847 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
3800XT
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
3738 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5827 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1989 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5085 points/GHz
5688 points/GHz
TOTAL
16638 points/GHz
19043 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4