Ryzen 7 3800XT vs Core i7-1280P
Description
The 3800XT is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the i7-1280P gets 468.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1280P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the i7-1280P gets 468.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1280P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
906a3
Core
Matisse
Alder Lake-P
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/20
TDP
105 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
July 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
78.2k points
91.45k points
Mean multithread perf.
508.89k points
468.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800XT
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
17.57k
39.78k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
27.38k
26.06k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.35k
12.44k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.9k
13.17k (x0.55)
TOTAL
78.2k
91.45k (x1.17)
Multithread
3800XT
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
176.08k
209.96k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
219.88k
170.21k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
72.04k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.93k
16.09k (x1.24)
TOTAL
508.89k
468.3k (x0.92)
Performance/W
3800XT
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
1677 points/W
7499 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
6079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
952 points/W
2573 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
123 points/W
575 points/W
TOTAL
4847 points/W
16725 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800XT
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
3738 points/GHz
8287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5827 points/GHz
5429 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1989 points/GHz
2592 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5085 points/GHz
2744 points/GHz
TOTAL
16638 points/GHz
19051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4