Ryzen 7 3800XT vs Core i7-12700
Description
The 3800XT is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-12700 is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 1.4 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800XT gets a score of 508.9 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 1.4 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
90672
Core
Matisse
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/20
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
25600 kB
Date
July 2020
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
78.2k points
104.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
508.89k points
698.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800XT
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
17.57k
48.39k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
27.38k
26.92k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.35k
13.37k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.9k
15.34k (x0.64)
TOTAL
78.2k
104.01k (x1.33)
Multithread
3800XT
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
176.08k
415.67k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
219.88k
158.57k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
109.37k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.93k
14.72k (x1.14)
TOTAL
508.89k
698.34k (x1.37)
Performance/W
3800XT
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
1677 points/W
6395 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
2440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
952 points/W
1683 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
123 points/W
226 points/W
TOTAL
4847 points/W
10744 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800XT
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
3738 points/GHz
9876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5827 points/GHz
5493 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1989 points/GHz
2728 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5085 points/GHz
3131 points/GHz
TOTAL
16638 points/GHz
21227 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4