Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i7-10750H
Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0652
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
349.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3800X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.47k
4.69k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
18.71k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.23k
5.84k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.15k
13.95k (x0.55)
TOTAL
55.26k
43.19k (x0.78)
Multithread
3800X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
36.1k
18.79k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
178.65k
86.1k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95.98k
27.42k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.03k
5.27k (x0.33)
TOTAL
326.76k
137.58k (x0.42)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3800X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
16.63k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
25.32k
24.17k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.36k
6.38k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.86k
13.69k (x0.49)
TOTAL
78.71k
60.87k (x0.77)
Multithread
3800X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
136.06k
67.07k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
195.06k
107.95k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.81k
27.05k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.91k
5.07k (x0.39)
TOTAL
441.85k
207.14k (x0.47)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.76k
16.71k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.16k
25.45k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
6.06k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.3k
13.2k (x0.54)
TOTAL
74.98k
61.43k (x0.82)
Multithread
3800X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
131.36k
67.59k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
198.51k
111.94k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.27k
27.7k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.4k
5.3k (x0.4)
TOTAL
440.54k
212.53k (x0.48)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
29.06k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
26.49k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
6.23k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
13.89k (x0.6)
TOTAL
75.81k
75.67k (x1)
Multithread
3800X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
154.61k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
151.34k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
36.33k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
6.93k (x0.48)
TOTAL
497.74k
349.21k (x0.7)
Performance/W
3800X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
7760 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4