| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i5-9600KF


Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 371.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
906ec
Core
Matisse
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
9216 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
77.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
371.08k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3800X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4.47k
4.63k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
19.43k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.23k
6.17k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.15k
13.82k (x0.55)
TOTAL
55.26k
44.04k (x0.8)

Multithread

3800X

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
36.1k
26.64k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
178.65k
110.11k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95.98k
33.07k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.03k
8.3k (x0.52)
TOTAL
326.76k
178.11k (x0.55)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3800X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
16.5k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
25.32k
24.35k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.36k
6.54k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.86k
13.59k (x0.49)
TOTAL
78.71k
60.98k (x0.77)

Multithread

3800X

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
136.06k
93.78k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
195.06k
134.47k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.81k
32.24k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.91k
8.22k (x0.64)
TOTAL
441.85k
268.71k (x0.61)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
16.76k
16.92k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
25.16k
25.44k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
6.36k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.3k
13.25k (x0.55)
TOTAL
74.98k
61.97k (x0.83)

Multithread

3800X

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
131.36k
95.51k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
198.51k
143.19k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.27k
33.85k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.4k
8.21k (x0.61)
TOTAL
440.54k
280.77k (x0.64)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
30.52k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
26.54k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
6.41k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
13.87k (x0.6)
TOTAL
75.81k
77.34k (x1.02)

Multithread

3800X

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
174.66k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
154.06k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
34.11k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
8.24k (x0.57)
TOTAL
497.74k
371.08k (x0.75)

Performance/W
3800X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
1839 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
1622 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
3906 points/W

Performance/GHz
3800X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
6635 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5769 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
1394 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
3015 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
16813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4