| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i5-10300H


Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800X is 2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0652
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.76k
15.65k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
25.16k
23.13k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
5.66k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.3k
11.43k (x0.47)
TOTAL
74.98k
55.87k (x0.75)

Multithread

3800X

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
131.36k
26.77k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
198.51k
43.81k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.27k
10.17k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.4k
11.91k (x0.89)
TOTAL
440.54k
92.66k (x0.21)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
27.14k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
24.75k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
5.73k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
11.84k (x0.51)
TOTAL
75.81k
69.47k (x0.92)

Multithread

3800X

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
105.77k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
107.47k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
24.82k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
8.02k (x0.55)
TOTAL
497.74k
246.07k (x0.49)

Performance/W
3800X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
3800X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4