Ryzen 7 3800X vs 1700X
Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
800f11
Core
Matisse
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
372.73k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800X
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.76k
12.5k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
25.16k
22.92k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
5.45k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.3k
14.72k (x0.61)
TOTAL
74.98k
55.59k (x0.74)
Multithread
3800X
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
131.36k
92.51k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
198.51k
144.76k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.27k
54.43k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.4k
22.08k (x1.65)
TOTAL
440.54k
313.78k (x0.71)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
13.72k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
22.48k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
5.12k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
15.44k (x0.67)
TOTAL
75.81k
56.76k (x0.75)
Multithread
3800X
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
110.92k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
200.56k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
54.24k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
7.01k (x0.48)
TOTAL
497.74k
372.73k (x0.75)
Performance/W
3800X
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800X
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4