Ryzen 7 3800X vs Ryzen 5 5625U
Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.8 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.8 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a50f00
Core
Matisse
Barcelo
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
18.57k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
22.03k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
9.55k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
20.5k (x0.88)
TOTAL
75.81k
70.65k (x0.93)
Multithread
3800X
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
92.92k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
128.4k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
54.82k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
5.13k (x0.35)
TOTAL
497.74k
281.26k (x0.57)
Performance/W
3800X
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800X
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4