| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3800X vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
Both models 3800X and 3600 are based on Zen 2 architecture.

Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.4 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
870f10
Core
Matisse
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
32768 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
348.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3800X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.47k
4.2k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
17.36k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.23k
7.5k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.15k
23.79k (x0.95)
TOTAL
55.26k
52.85k (x0.96)

Multithread

3800X

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
36.1k
22.11k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
178.65k
108.04k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95.98k
56.81k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.03k
36.39k (x2.27)
TOTAL
326.76k
223.36k (x0.68)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3800X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
15.38k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
25.32k
21.94k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.36k
7.97k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.86k
24.76k (x0.89)
TOTAL
78.71k
70.05k (x0.89)

Multithread

3800X

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
136.06k
96.91k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
195.06k
135.12k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.81k
70.39k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.91k
56.43k (x4.37)
TOTAL
441.85k
358.85k (x0.81)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.76k
15.04k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
25.16k
20.95k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
8.57k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.3k
21.71k (x0.89)
TOTAL
74.98k
66.27k (x0.88)

Multithread

3800X

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
131.36k
94.36k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
198.51k
141.73k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.27k
69.38k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.4k
32.72k (x2.44)
TOTAL
440.54k
338.19k (x0.77)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
16.04k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
24.47k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
8.38k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
21.66k (x0.93)
TOTAL
75.81k
70.55k (x0.93)

Multithread

3800X

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
113.63k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
143.55k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
63.84k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
27.34k (x1.88)
TOTAL
497.74k
348.35k (x0.7)

Performance/W
3800X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
3800X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4