| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3800X vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800X is 2.9 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
800f11
Core
Matisse
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
173.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3800X
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.47k
3.95k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
18.36k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.23k
5.39k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.15k
17.35k (x0.69)
TOTAL
55.26k
45.06k (x0.82)

Multithread

3800X

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
36.1k
19.47k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
178.65k
77.19k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95.98k
15.4k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.03k
12.25k (x0.76)
TOTAL
326.76k
124.3k (x0.38)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
14.63k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
24.09k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
5.51k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
15.86k (x0.68)
TOTAL
75.81k
60.09k (x0.79)

Multithread

3800X

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
48.75k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
80.1k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
24.5k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
19.85k (x1.36)
TOTAL
497.74k
173.2k (x0.35)

Performance/W
3800X
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
3800X
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4