Ryzen 7 3800X vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 3 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 3 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
810f81
Core
Matisse
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3800X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.47k
3.89k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
17.41k
17.94k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.23k
5.34k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.15k
6.62k (x0.26)
TOTAL
55.26k
33.79k (x0.61)
Multithread
3800X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
36.1k
15.07k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
178.65k
66.84k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95.98k
19.56k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.03k
6.54k (x0.41)
TOTAL
326.76k
108.01k (x0.33)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3800X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
14.3k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
25.32k
21.69k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.36k
5.42k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.86k
6.6k (x0.24)
TOTAL
78.71k
48k (x0.61)
Multithread
3800X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
136.06k
55.45k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
195.06k
83.13k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.81k
20.76k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.91k
6.58k (x0.51)
TOTAL
441.85k
165.91k (x0.38)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.76k
13.05k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
25.16k
22.88k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
5.39k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.3k
7.31k (x0.3)
TOTAL
74.98k
48.63k (x0.65)
Multithread
3800X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
131.36k
51.73k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
198.51k
87.74k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.27k
20.74k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.4k
6.57k (x0.49)
TOTAL
440.54k
166.79k (x0.38)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
14.48k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
23.84k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
5.43k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
5.46k (x0.24)
TOTAL
75.81k
49.21k (x0.65)
Multithread
3800X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
54.39k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
88.77k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
20.04k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
5.48k (x0.38)
TOTAL
497.74k
168.69k (x0.34)
Performance/W
3800X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800X
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4