| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i7-1260P


Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
906a3
Core
Matisse
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
105 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
18432 kB
Date
July 2019
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
94.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
391.07k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
41.94k (x2.45)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
26.81k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
12.63k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
13.51k (x0.58)
TOTAL
75.81k
94.9k (x1.25)

Multithread

3800X

i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
168.12k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
148.09k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
60.28k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
14.58k (x1)
TOTAL
497.74k
391.07k (x0.79)

Performance/W
3800X
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
6004 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
5289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
2153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
13967 points/W

Performance/GHz
3800X
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
8924 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
2687 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2875 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
20191 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4