Ryzen 7 3800X vs Core i5-11300H
Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.7 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.7 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
806c1
Core
Matisse
Tiger Lake H35
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
285.75k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
25.83k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
23.56k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
9.2k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
5.06k (x0.22)
TOTAL
75.81k
63.64k (x0.84)
Multithread
3800X
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
116.87k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
121.08k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
41.8k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
6k (x0.41)
TOTAL
497.74k
285.75k (x0.57)
Performance/W
3800X
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
8164 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800X
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4